The Bear community exists as a subculture in a reaction to the bigger homosexual community. It rejects the normative idealized male beauty revered by conventional homosexual males. While qualitative information document such self-identifiers as masculine-acting homosexual guys who weigh more while having more human anatomy locks, here needs to date been no quantitative analysis for this team’s faculties. In reaction, we carried out two large-scale studies of homosexual guys determining as Bears (letter = 469) to review their self-reported real, behavioral, and traits that are psychological. Our studies suggested that Bears had been more prone to be hairier, heavier, and smaller than conventional men that are gay. They reported wanting lovers whom were hairier and heavier. They certainly were less likely to want to reject partners that are sexual the lovers they did reject were more prone to be young or weigh not enough (in other terms., weren’t bearish). Bears had been more most most likely than conventional men that are gay enact diverse intimate habits ( ag e.g., fisting, voyeurism) and were comparatively more masculine. Bears had lower self-esteem but were believe it or not (or higher) hypermasculine than non-Bears. We concluded that Bears are extremely intimate. We speculate that Bears are seen as less appealing than what exactly is typically regarded as appealing. The lovers they could attract can be restricted and, in reaction to the limitation, they might be especially attuned to search out lovers that will perhaps not reject them. This problem may create the reduced self-esteem exhibited and may also explain the way the Bear tradition developed to make sure that perhaps the heaviest, hairiest, and/or individual that is shortest can mate.